I my humble opinion, Cannonical ist making a capital mistake: Ubuntu comes with "Linux fonts" only.
Since almost all potential users come from Windows, they have legacy documents written using Windows fonts. Almost all the Web is designed to display using Windows fonts.
When these fonts are missing in Ubuntu (they are available for free!) the imported documents look differently and sometimes look broken. Quite a lot of websites as well!
Why refraining to include them by default, just because of their origin?
Once you have loaded these core fonts:
- Ubuntu Firefox becomes to display Webpages like Windows Firefox do: correctly!
- OpenOffice becomes to display Office documents like Windows OpenOffice do: correctly!
- and so on...
Most of the potential users will leave Ubuntu due to the unfinished aspect of the imported documents and the staggered website display far before having got a chance to discover the possiblity to download the Windows Core fonts.
The Windows core fonts really makes Ubuntu useable. Apple has understood that and offers these fonts out of the box.
if it must absolutely be open source, then at least the Liberation Fonts should be included, they are not absolutely perfect (specially in bold and italic), but the have got the metrics to display the documents and the Websites correctly.
Last but for me not least, for those who dislike blurry fonts: the Arial font displays crisp and clean without antialiasing at all sizes, none of the Ubuntu fonts does the job as well.
RIN67630
P.S. for those of you wanting to see the desktop with these fonts take a look a the attachment.