I would like clarification on the legality of remastering and distributing Ubuntu whether renumeration is received or not!
I work at a specialist college for visually impaired adults and I have been experimenting with a version of Ubuntu optimised for the visually impaired. There is a thread in the Assistive Software and Accessibility section of the Ubuntu forums discussing the technical issues etc (Vibuntu). The primary motivation is provide a accessible open-source operating system customised to make it as accessible as possible for visually impaired learners. The main distribution does provide some accessibility features but requires a lot of tweaking way beyond the ability of most beginners.
Firstly I would like to know whether we are allowed as a college (or as an individual) to remaster and distibute Ubuntu, call it Vibuntu and leave in the Ubuntu logos etc. The remix only contains packages from the official Ubuntu repositories and contains no restricted packages or codecs etc. The only third party application included is remastersys which is used to remaster it in the first place. Is this legal? Do we have to remove the Ubuntu icons? Can we call it Vibuntu?
Secondly, although the primary aim is purely altruistic, if it is successful and becomes popular I can envisage the college wanting to provide training, sell user guides or possibly supply it on a CD or USB stick for a small charge to cover the costs of production. Does this change the legal position?
I could remove all the logos etc and call it Vinux etc, but I would rather leave in the Ubuntu logos and retain the Vibuntu name because the credit for this remaster really should largely belong to Ubuntu/Canonical and I often feel that people who remaster Ubuntu, remove the logos and call it something unrelated to Ubuntu are sort of taking credit for something they haven't done.
I do not want to start yet another debate about the ethics of distributing a remastered version version of a distro or the morality of making financial gains from doing so. I would really appreciate a response from someone who knows the answer to these questions. I would have contacted Canonical directly, but I could not see any obvious way to do this without filling in a commercial inquiry form.
I look forward to any informed responses.
Dr.Anthony Sales