4 years have passed, and the Ubuntu One team still does not understand why Dropbox is more successful. It is SO EASY in Dropbox to make a link to some data/settings and have it backed up. You don't have to think.
Also I like to have a little ecryptfs on there, and I need a link to a directory outside my home, not to the folder in Ubuntu One (which is a popular workaround) because you cannot mount ecryptfs (custom) from within ecryptfs (default encrypted home).
Of course, a typical developer would argue *"you can work around this, you can share additional folders, you can specify the location on other computers, etc"*
But:
- You have to sit down and think how to tackle your specific problem.
- You cannot easily specify the location of a new synced directory on a machine without the control panel (deamon only)
- You would have to remove the existing local target application folder and store the U1 folder in the new location.
- This folder will first sync completely (new computer), and then you have to move it out of home and you have to wait again (e.g. encrypted home -> non-encrypted share)
- *"Please choose a folder inside your "/home/redsandro" directory, and not overlapping with any existing cloud folder."*
Ubuntu One is giving me acid reflux.
Why waste time postponing ways to handle this (i.e. ignore symlinks) when there is a perfectly fine POSIX equivalent of symbolic links developed in the '60s?
lodp said: It seems eminently useful for backing up / syncing application data (knotes is a good example, but I'd also like to use it for thunderbird, firefox, korganizer and such)