dcstar said: Why do I have to explain the bloody obvious?
Because OBVIOUSLY there was room in _YOUR POST_ for 'misinterpretation'.
dcstar said: I do not know what YOUR NTFS partition is, REPLACE that with the actual designation of your NTFS partition.
Yeah, that part too was "bloody obvious", and counter productive.
For future reference when giving advice, most times, an example (just to be absolutely clear) goes a long long way towards helping others _completely_ understand what it is you are saying.
That too should have been "bloody obvious" to you. You choose to ignore that however (and the other OBVIOUS questions), and instead decided to be snippy.
dcstar said: If you are not able to identify what partition you are supposed to be working on ...
I would have thought: [COLOR=DarkRed]"... /dev/sda1 .... (_assuming_ that it was the 1st partition on the drive that I was trying to change the UUID on."[/COLOR] was "bloody obvious" that I knew which partition it was that I was trying to change the UUID on. No? >>>>_sda1_<<<<
dcstar said: . . . that I strongly advise you not to use commands like this until your Linux skills significantly improve.
Completely irrelevant, totally useless, and utterly pompous advise. Seriously, how is anything like that helpful to anyone. WOW! I think that this community and forum have been amazing at helping people learn the "bloody obvious" without being condescending.
dcstar, I strongly advise that you be "crystal clear" with your code by "giving examples", AND when questions are asked about the code that you have given, that you answer ALL of them (even if to you it is 'bloody obvious') in order to help others "improve their Linux skills significantly".
Your last post does linux, ubuntu, and this forum a huge disservice IMHO.
===========
Now that those pleasantries are out of the way, and, after looking at it again and giving my head a smack for missing the *bloody obvious*, AND at the risk of misunderstanding dcstar again, I'll attempt to answer my queries for the _benefit of others_
The Code dcstar posted was:
sudo dd if=/dev/urandom bs=80 count=1 | xxd -l 80 -c 8 | tail -1 | xxd -r - /dev/sd-NTFS-Partition
I'd like, for the benefit of others, to provide an _*example*_ of what _I think_ dcstar was trying to say (please dcstar correct me if I have still got it wrong):
If I was trying to change the UUID of the _first partition_ on the _first hard drive_ the code should have been this:
sudo dd if=/dev/urandom bs=80 count=1 | xxd -l 80 -c 8 | tail -1 | xxd -r - /dev/**sda1**
I have seen some posts say things like: replace xx with ..... *(some value where the x's are representing something else)* hence my query about the 'xxd' part of the code.
I know, I know - dcstar didn't say anything about changing anything with the "x's" - clearly my Linux (& reading comprehension) skills need improving, but that is why I (and many others) are here :D, and it is not going to stop me from tinkering while I learn :biggrin:.
also, I believe the -l in the xxd -l is a lower case "L" the count=1 is a "ONE" ===>not sure if that was supposed to be "bloody obvious" . . . '*_count_=*1' :roll: and in 'tail -1' . . . that I am pretty sure is a "ONE"
To Repeat dcstar's comment - ... all the spaces are required.
_Hopefully_ I have this right, and I haven't mislead anyone while trying to clear this up.