MoxJet said: Arch doesn't require much tweaking. I didn't find it difficult at all, compared to the confusion that can appear with gentoo. Compared to Ubuntu installation, the only difference is more options, and text based GUI...
The installation is very, very quick, and then to pacman Xorg and Gnome doesn't take long time at all... I got my system up running like my Ubuntu does (xorg, gnome, nvidia, samba, webcam, mounting/grubbing, network, ssh, alsa, apps: gimp, pidgin, amsn, wine/photoshop7.0, gnomebaker, rhythmbox, ooffice ) up in well... less than four hours. And that is mainly reading the arch wiki... Great stuff, lots of fun, good luck!
My gentoo installations has taken forever and I haven't successfully got my nvidia to run... I shall try again now though through the confidence boost after Arch...
Could have been my words..
The Arch Way gives a good impression of this little distro. I tried them all over the years, including Gentoo, great control, too much for me since control=responsability and hard work sometimes.. I'm laizy I guess. I want it simply (google "KISS principle"), fast and uptodate.. and man, is Arch up to date! It's a rolling release distro giving you the luxery to have a brandnew system every time you "pacman -Syu".
Good luck.